VIRUSMYTH HOMEPAGE


WHAT NATURE PUBLISHED

On May 18, 1995, Nature published a Duesberg-Bialy letter flanked by two editorial comments:


1) "AIDS pathology unknown"

Nature
375: 167, 18 May 1995

HIV infection provokes hyperactivity of the immune system, but the causes of that are far from understood.

The clutch of contributions to Scientific Correspondence (page 193) this week deserves a reading, both for its inherent interest and for what it says about the present state of AIDS research. It will be recalled this journal published in January an account of research that showed that the infection of a person by the virus HIV ordinarily evokes not the previously suspected quiescence of the immune system, but a rapid turnover both of the vulnerable lymphocytes and of the virus itself. The then-general opinion that the first reaction of the human body to infection by HIV is a kind of indifference was dramatically and directly challenged. Nothing that has since come to light denies the challenge. But it has also become plain that too little is yet known of the dynamics of the immune system. That is a gap to fill.

The second arresting feature of this correspondence is the letter from Dr. Peter Duesberg and his colleague, Dr. Harvey Bialy, which has been published without change. Sadly, there seems no way in which the authors concerned can be persuaded that "free and fair scientific debate" is ordinarily understood to mean a progressive process, one in which each of two sides learns from what the other says. A restatement of earlier and well-known positions is not that at all. On this occasion, Duesberg and Bialy's citation of Loveday in their cause is especially inappropriate, given Loveday's name among the authors of a letter supporting Wei et al. and Ho et al. But no further solicitation of Duesberg's opinion is called for.


2) "HIV an illusion"

Letter from Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy, Nature 375: 197, 18 May 1995

SIR - In an editorial in the 19 January issue of Nature, John Maddox invited "Duesberg and his associates" to comment on the "HIV-1 dynamics" papers published the previous week, indicating that these new results should prove an embarrassment to us. Although we do not think that a scientist should be embarrassed for pointing out inconsistencies and paradoxes in a hypothesis that have only been reportedly resolved 10 years later, we nonetheless prepared a fully referenced, approximately 2,000-word critique of the Ho et al. (2) and Wei et al. (3) papers that we believed met the criteria of "not being longer than it needs to be, and pertaining to the papers at hand" that Maddox set out in his widely read challenge.

Unfortunately, he did not share our view and agreed to publish only a radically shortened version, and only after he had personally "gone over it with a fine-tooth comb" to remove our perceived misrepresentations of the issues. We found these new conditions so totally at variance with the spirit of free and fair scientific debate that we could not agree to them.

Readers of Nature who are interested in these questions, and feel that they do not need to be protected by Maddox from our ill-conceived logic, can find the complete text of our commentary in the monograph supplement to the most recent issue of Genetica (4). Here we would point out only that the central claim of the Ho et al. (2) and Wei et al. (3) papers-that 105 HIV virions per ml plasma can be detected in AIDS patients with various nucleic-acid amplification assays is misleading. The senior author of the Wei et al. paper has previously claimed that the PCR method they used overestimates by at least 60,000 times the real titer of infectious HIV (5): 100,000/60,000 is 1.7 infectious HIVs per ml, hardly the "virological mayhem" alluded to by Wain-Hobson.(6) Further, Ho and a different group of collaborators have just shown (7) that more than 10,000 "plasma virions," detected by the branched-DNA amplification assay used in their Nature paper, correspond to less than one (!) infectious virus per ml. And infectious units, after all, are the only clinically relevant criteria for a viral pathogen.

Finally, in view of Wain-Hobson's statement (6) that "the concordance of their [Wei and Ho's] data is remarkable," note that Loveday et al. (8) report the use of a PCR-based assay and find only 200 HIV "virion RNAs" per ml of serum of AIDS patients-1,000 times less than Ho and Wei. So much for the "remarkable concordance."

Peter Duesberg

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Harvey Bialy

Bio/Technology, New York, New York 10010, USA


Notes and References

1. Maddox, J. Nature 373, 189 (1995).

2. Ho, D. D. et al. Nature 373, 123-126 (1995).

3. Wei. X. et al. Nature 373, 117-122 (1995).

4. Duesberg, P. & Bialy, H. Genetica Suppl. (in the press).

5. Piatak, M. et al. Science 259. 1749-1754 (1993).

6. Wain-Hobson, S. Nature 373, 102 (1995).

7. Cao, Y. et al. New Engl. J. Med. 332, 201-208 (1995).

8. Loveday, C. et al. Lancet 345, 820-824 (1995).


3) Editorial Statement

This letter was followed by the editorial statement:

"Peter Duesberg was offered space in Scientific Correspondence for 500 words of his own choice, but declined. - Editor, Scientific Correspondence." *


VIRUSMYTH HOMEPAGE