By Roberto Giraldo

June 2000

The idea that HIV, the virus that supposedly causes AIDS, is "heterosexually transmitted" in African countries and mostly "homosexually transmitted" in Western countries cannot be explained by known epidemiological rules.

This is why, since the beginning of AIDS in Africa, when reports were showing that the syndrome was equally distributed in men and women, researchers have been speculating about explanations for what they name "An Epidemiologic Paradigm" (1).

The problem is that the belief that HIV is the cause of AIDS does not allow health care professionals, researchers, journalists, and lay people to see the real explanations for the ways that the AIDS epidemic is manifesting itself within different communities, countries, and continents. HIV is an obstacle to finding the objective causes of AIDS. Nor does the HIV theory permit the proper measures to be taken to stop the spread of the epidemic. This is the true danger of HIV!

The following are some of the reasons that researchers who believe that HIV is the cause of AIDS have given to explain why in Africa AIDS affects both sexes equally: late age at marriage; sexual cravings and excesses; gross heterosexual promiscuity; highest levels of polygyny; the rubbing of monkey’s blood into cuts as an aphrodisiac; truck drivers who get HIV from prostitutes and then infect their wives; duration of postpartum abstinence; women being allowed to participate in commerce and maintain separate budgets from husbands; high levels of sterility caused by widespread sexually transmitted diseases; unusual sexual practices that facilitate transmission; the practice of female circumcision; the lack of male circumcision; etc. (2-6).

Western health experts and journalists accuse Africans of gross heterosexual promiscuity. Do they have proof for it? Recently, Nobel Prize winner Nadine Gordiner wrote in the New York Times that African promiscuity "is difficult to condemn when sex is the cheapest or only available satisfaction for people society leaves to live on the street" (7).

Regarding male circumcision, the following are some of the arguments that defenders of HIV as the cause of AIDS provide to promote male genital mutilation in Africa (2,8-12):

"A joint Canadian-Kenyan medical research team working in Kenyatta Medical School in Nairobi, where the epidemic is intense, had reported a year earlier that AIDS rates were higher among Luo migrants from western Kenya than among the Kikuyu from central Kenya". Later the authors "surmised that the Luo were at greater risk because, unlike the Kukuyu, they were not circumcised" (2,10).

"An American team led by John Bongaarts of the Population Council published a paper showing that the regions across sub-Saharan Africa with high levels of HIV infection among local peoples corresponded well with the areas where men were typically uncircumcised" (9).

"Most of the ideas we investigated failed to explain the extraordinarily high rate of infection in the AIDS belt. One factor did stand out, however: lack of male circumcision. In the area where men are typically uncircumcised, HIV rates are among the highest in the AIDS belt" (2).

"We noted that the areas of Africa with large numbers of uncircumcised men were almost exactly the same as the regions suffering from the severe AIDS epidemic", and "The link between lack of circumcision and elevated levels of HIV infection appears robust" (2).

"For uncircumcised men, thorough cleaning of the genitals can be particularly challenging" (2).

"Outside the AIDS belt, in the city of Abidjan, the capital of Ivory Cost, levels of HIV infection are as high as they are in some cities of the AIDS belt; we believe the epidemic in Abidjan is very likely sustained by immigrants who come from a surrounding area where the majority of men are uncircumcised" (2).

"Thus, we concluded that in the AIDS belt, lack of male circumcision in combination with risky sexual behavior, such as having multiple sex partners, engaging in sex with prostitutes and leaving chancroid untreated, has led to rampant HIV transmission. Unsafe sexual practices have certainly contributed to the spread of AIDS across Africa and indeed around the world" (2).

HIV researchers have gone further: "In sub-Saharan Africa, circumcision could be offered as a reinforcement of other protective measures" (2).

"These men are appearing at hospitals in sharply increasing numbers, requesting circumcision for themselves and often for their sons. Clinics that offer adult male circumcision as a protection against AIDS now advertise in Tanzanian newspapers" (2).

However, HIV researchers know in advance that these measures are not good enough: "Although the epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa may subside somewhat, because of greater use of condoms and probably increased incidence of circumcision, Africans in the AIDS belt remain at extremely high risk of HIV infection" (2). They are opening doors to pharmaceutical companies to bring to Africa the expensive "help" of the World Bank, to medicate with immunotoxic antiretrovirals HIV-positive Africans or simply those who are presumed to be positive (13).

The words of a professor of African History speak by themselves: "Racist assumptions about African sexuality merit scrutiny. Generalizations about African sexual practices are analytically useless but perpetuate racist stereotypes about insatiable sexual appetites and carnal exotica. Media misinterpretations of African sexuality and its alleged link to AIDS have spawned inordinate anxieties and pervasive despair in regions already afflicted with extreme poverty, ravaged by war, and deprived of primary health care delivery systems" and, he continues, "the political economy of underdevelopment and environmentally caused endemic sickness, not extraordinary sexual behavior or a sexually transmitted virus, are what’s killing Africans. The so-called AIDS epidemic has become the medicalization of poverty to justify Western medical intervention in the form of vaccine trials, drug testing, and evangelistic demands for behavior modification. AIDS scientists and public health planners must reconsider the role of malnutrition, poor sanitation, anemia, and parasitic and endemic infections for producing the clinical AIDS symptoms that are manifestations of non-HIV insults" (5).

Belief in HIV prevents the understanding that AIDS in Africa is happening now because never before has poverty been so prevalent and intense as it is now in the African areas where AIDS is epidemic. The only rational way to stop the spread of the AIDS epidemic in the African continent is by finding solutions for the economic disparities that are rampant in Africa (14,15).

AIDS in Africa is not an epidemiologic paradigm. There exists a serious crisis in the scientific methodology; currently, the problem is that epidemiologic ignorance is pandemic. Lets go back to the teaching of epidemiology to find a solution to AIDS in Africa and elsewhere (16-41).

President Thabo Mbeki is absolutely right when he demands a scientific answer to the question: "Why is HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa heterosexually transmitted while in the Western world it is said to be largely homosexually transmitted?"

I am certain that Africans will continue questioning and rejecting the ethnic fictions and racial slanders described here. They are already standing up to defend their integrity.

This article was written in June 2000 and posted during the Internet Discussion of the South African Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel


  1. Quinn TC, Mann JM, Curran JW, Piot P. AIDS in Africa: An Epidemiologic Paradigm. Science 1986; 234: 956-963.
  2. Caldwell JC, Caldwell P. The African AIDS Epidemic. In parts of sub-Saharan Africa, nearly 25 percent of the population is HIV-positive as a result of heterosexual transmission of the virus. Could lack of circumcision make men in this region particularly susceptible? Scientific American 1996; 274(3): 62-68.
  3. Geshekter CL. Rethinking AIDS in Africa. Reappraising AIDS 1995; 3(2): 1-4
  4. Geshekter CL. Outbreak? AIDS, Africa, and the Medicalization of Poverty. Is Africa facing a lethal pandemic? Transition 1995; 5(3): 5-14.
  5. Geshekter CL. AIDS, Underdevelopment, and Sexual Stereotypes: Rethinking AIDS in Africa. 39th Annual Meeting of the African Studies Association. San Francisco, California. November 23-26, 1996.
  6. Bethell T. Mbeki takes on the AIDS Industry. South African President queries epidemic, AZT. Reappraising AIDS 2000; 8(3): 1-4.
  7. Gordimer N. Africa’s Plague, and Everyone’s" The New York Times. April 11, 2000.
  8. Ankomah B. Are 26 millions Africans Dying of AIDS? "The biggest lie of the century" under fire. New African 1998; No. 369: 34-42.
  9. Bongaarts J, Reining P, Way P, Conant F. The Relationship Between Male Circumcision and HIV Infection in African Populations. AIDS 1989; 3(6): 373-377.
  10. Moses S et al. Geographical Patterns of Male Circumcision Practices in Africa: Association with HIV Seroprevalence. Internat J Epidemiol 1990; 19(3): 693-697.
  11. Orubuloye IO, Caldwell JC, Caldwell P, Santow G Editors. Sexual Networking and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Behavioural Research and the Social Context. Australian National University. 1994.
  12. Forum: The East African AIDS Epidemic and the Absence of Male Circumcision: What is the Link? Health Transition Review 1995; 5(1): 97-117.
  13. World Bank. Confronting AIDS: Public Priorities in a Global Epidemic. A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999: 365.
  14. Giraldo R. AIDS and Stressors: AIDS is not an infectious disease nor is sexually transmitted. It is a toxic-nutritional syndrome caused by the alarming worldwide increment of immunological stressor agents. Medellin, Colombia: Impresos Begon, 1997: 205.
  15. Giraldo R et al. Is it rational to treat or prevent AIDS with toxic antiretroviral drugs in pregnant women, infants, children, and anybody else? The answer is negative. Continuum (London) 1999; 5(6): 38-52.
  16. Abramson JH. Making Sense of Associations. Factors and Risk Markers. Causes and Effects. In: Making Sense of Data; A Self- Instruction Manual on the Interpretation of Epidemiological DATA. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988: 193-264, 219-228 and 265-316.
  17. Buck C, Llopis A, Najera E, et al. Etiologic Investigations. Studies in Epidemics. In: The Challenge of Epidemiology, Issues and Selected Readings. Pan American Health Organization, Scientific Publication No. 505. PAHO, Pan American Sanitary Bureau, Regional Office of the WHO. Washington DC, 1988: 147-166 and 415-482.
  18. Elwood JM. The Diagnosis of Causation. In: Causal Relationships in Medicine. A Practical System for Critical Appraisal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988: 163-182.
  19. Elwood JM. The Importance of Causal Relationships in Medicine and Health Care. What is Causation? A Direct Test of Causation. In: Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998: 3-13.
  20. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Wagner EH. Risk. Cause. In: Clinical Epidemiology: the Essentials. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1996: 94-110 and 228-248.
  21. Friedman GD. Making Sence out of Statistical Associations. In: Primer of Epidemiology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994: 194-224.
  22. Garb JL. Understanding Medical Research. A Practitioner’s Guide. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1996: 256.
  23. Gordis L. Estimating Risk: Is There an Association? From Association to Causation: Deriving Inferences From Epidemiologic Studies. More on Causal Inferences: Bias, Confounding, and Interactions. In: Epidemiology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1996: 141-154, 167-182 and 183-195.
  24. Hutt MSR, Burkitt DP. Environment and the causes of disease. In: The Geography of Non-Infectious Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986: 1-6.
  25. Jekel JF, Elmore JG, Katz DL. The Study of Causation in Epidemiologic Investigations and Reasearch. Assessment of Risk in Epidemiologic Studies. In: Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Preventive Medicine. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1996: 54-64 and 74-84.
  26. MacMahon B, Trichopoulos D. Concepts of Cause. In: Epidemiology Principles and Methods. Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1996: 19-30.
  27. Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Jhonson S, et al. The Framing Effect of Relative and Absolute Risk. J Gen Intern Med 1993; 8:543-548.
  28. McMaster University Health Services Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. How to Read Clinical Journals IV: To Determine Etiology or Causation. Can Med Assoc J 1981; 124:985-990.
  29. Rothman KJ. Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Multiple Analysis. Interactions Between Causes. Analysis with Multiple Levels of Exposure. In: Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little Brown, 1986: 7-22, 285-310, 311-326 and 327-350.
  30. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and Causal Inference. In: Detels R et al. Oxford Textbook of Public Health. Third Edition. Volume 2; The Methods of Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997: 617-630.
  31. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and Causal Inference. In: Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott – Raven, 1998: 7-28.
  32. Schlesselman JJ. "Proof" of Cause and effect in Epidemiologic Studies: Criteria for Judments. Prev Med 1987; 16:195-210.
  33. Sheldon H. Causes of Disease. In: Boyd’s Introduction to the Study of Disease. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1992: 49-82.
  34. Soskolne CL, MacFarlane DK. Scientific Misconduct in Epidemiologic Research. In: Coughlin SS, Beauchamp TL. Ethics in Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996: 274-289.
  35. Stolley Pd, Lasky T. Epidemics and Science. In: Investigating Disease Patterns. The Science of Epidemiology. New York: Scientific American Library, 1995: 1-22.
  36. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Assessing Causation. In: PDQ Epidemiology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996: 121-134.
  37. Susser M. Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies of Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 1973: 181.
  38. Susser M. What is a Cause and How Do We Know One? A Grammar for Pragmatic Epidemiology. Amer J Epidemiol 1991; 133:635-648.
  39. Torrence ME. Causality. In: Understanding Epidemiology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997: 133-151.
  40. Weed DL. On the Logic of Causal Inference. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 965-979.
  41. Weiss NS. Natural History of Illness. In: Clinical Epidemiology: The Study of the Outcome of Illness.