When the Christian missionaries of the last three or four centuries
were evangelizing so-called "primitive people, they believed
that they had only to destroy or burn the various cult objects of these
people in order to eradicate their religions, superstitions, and customs.
Centuries after the conquistadors tried to stamp out the Inca culture,
or the Inquisition tried to stamp out the protestant heresies,
or the similar attempts to annihilate the Voodoo, or the many African
and Asian religions, we know that such arrogant high-handedness does not
work. These beliefs still continue today, sometimes under different guises,
long after the objects of worship associated with them have been destroyed.
This lesson from history is not only valid for primitive people and their
religions. It can equally be applied if not more so to aspects
of our own modern society. Indeed, even a superficial study of contemporary
culture will reveal that the supposed secularization of present day society
is just an illusion. Even though most people do not conform to the outward
show of religious custom and practice mostly Judeo-Christian in
western culture the beliefs and superstitions remain deeply embedded
in their subconscious, influencing many aspects of their daily lives without
them realizing it.
And as several sociology studies have shown, the superstitious beliefs
that used to be attached to the formal religions have in many cases simply
been transferred to other objects, persons or events. The daily evening
television news bulletins, watched by millions worldwide in their respective
countries, the stars of show business and sport, humanitarian associations,
cults and all sorts of other things in modern life, these have now become
the new gods we venerate or fear, or the shrines at which we worship or
curse, and where we still experience those primitive religious urges and
feelings, where we can believe without necessarily having to think or
However, it is in the field of medicine that this unconscious transposition
of the religious experience - and more specifically the Judeo-Christian
ideology, myths, beliefs, expectations and hopes - seems to have had the
greatest impact. The facts show clearly - for anyone taking the time to
study them - that medicine enjoys today an astonishing degree of undeserved
credit that is out of all proportion to its actual results or promises.
Real health keeps regressing, while the great medical "miracles,
such as vaccines and antibiotics, are now clearly showing their limitations,
which some had foreseen and warned of right from the start. This undeserved
credit comes mostly from the fact that medicine and science have replaced
religion as the only certain belief in an uncertain world. And the doctors
and scientists are seen as the priests of the new religion, delivering
through the certainties of science what the old discredited gods were
not able to deliver. If we can no longer believe in the miracles, the
cures, and the curses of the old religions, we can certainly believe in
the miracles, the cures and the destructive powers of the new science.
Almost imperceptibly, medicine has taken on a saving, or messianic role,
the characteristics of which we must examine. Looking back through history,
there is a sense in which medicine can be said to have displayed characteristics
that have at various times characterised the Roman Catholic Church: autocracy,
centralization, the control and manipulation of people, censorship, propaganda,
total obedience, infallibility, the destruction of heretics, the stamping
out of individuality. All this, of course, has been done in the name of
public health and the general good, just as the church acted for mankinds
Let me make my position clear. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I do not
believe that doctors, scientists and governments are intentionally and
corruptly conspiring together, abusing their powers in pursuit of wealth,
"Big Brother and "Brave New World just a step away.
But rather, I do believe we are faced with a phenomenon that is largely
of the unconscious kind.
What I believe is happening is that people, whether within the medico-pharmaceutical
industry or outside it, are being subconsciously influenced by their deeply
rooted myths, fears and superstitions which are now being projected onto
the new screens of science and medicine. This produces an amazing paradox.
Although medicine sees itself as exclusively scientific and rational,
with no room for spiritual or human dimensions (such as psychic healers,
or shamans, who are dismissed as charlatans), it organizes itself and
functions in a way that can be described as intrinsically religious. The
paradox is that by rejecting any spiritual dimension medicine in fact
becomes the toy of the forces and myths it tries to ignore and cannot
control. Mere denial of somethings existence has never made it disappear,
except perhaps in our consciousness, but instead, it is banished to our
subconscious mind, where, beyond our control, it can roam free, wreak
havoc, and wield even greater power.
We can see, then, that even though our society considers itself to be
secular, it has remained as Christian as it was a century ago, but with
two major differences. Firstly, our society is not aware of it. It believes
itself to be rational, scientific, and free of superstition. It fails
to recognise that it is still, in effect, observing the old religious
rituals, but under a new guise. Secondly, our society now lives its religious
experiences through secular forms - medical ones, in particular - and
has at the same time transferred its hopes and aspirations from the spiritual
world to the material.
Medicine, then, has become the new world religion. The specific myths,
beliefs and rites of Christianity have been unconsciously projected over
medicine since Pasteur. As I explain in detail in my book, we can establish
a very close parallelism between the catholic religion and modern medicine,
although, for lack of space, I cannot go into all the details of each
comparison in this article. In brief:
- physicians have taken the place of priests;
- vaccination plays the same initiatory role as baptism, and is accompanied
by the same threats and fears;
- the search for health has replaced the quest for salvation;
- the fight against disease has replaced the fight against sin;
- eradication of viruses has taken the place of exorcising demons;
- the hope of physical immortality (cloning, genetic engineering) has
been substituted for the hope of eternal life;
- pills have replaced the sacrament of bread and wine;
- donations to cancer research take precedence over donations to the church;
- a hypothetical universal vaccine could save humanity from all its illnesses,
as the Saviour has saved the world from all its sins;
- the medical power has become the governments ally, as was the
Catholic Church in the past;
- "charlatans are persecuted today as "heretics
- dogmatism rules out promising alternative medical theories;
- the same absence of individual responsibility is now found in medicine,
as previously in the Christian religion;
- patients are alienated from their bodies, as sinners used to be from
People are still being manipulated by their fears and childish hopes.
They are still told that the source of their problems is outside them,
and that the solution can only come from the outside. They are not allowed
to do anything by themselves and they must have the mediation of priest-physicians,
the administration of drug-hosts, and the protection of vaccine-absolutions.
Just as the magnetic field of a magnet placed under a sheet of paper controls
the way iron filings fall on its surface, revealing the invisible lines
of force between the two poles of the magnet, a "religious field
likewise imperceptibly structures and organises the development of modern
medicine. Invisible, impalpable, this "religious field is made
up of all the beliefs, myths and values of the Christian - and more specifically
the Catholic - religion. In other words, the secularisation of society
happened only on the surface. We took away the "iron filings,
the specific religious forms, but we did not change the "current
of thoughts, the underlying "religious field, which continued
to exert the same influence, but through medicine. That is the reason
why behind the different structures of medicine and the Church of Rome
we find the same fundamental concepts, the same relationships, the same
characteristics, the same fears, the same hopes and expectations.
This substitution of medicine for religion has had many unfortunate consequences.
In medical research, it influences what should be looked for and what
can be discovered. Any discovery or theory that is at odds with the over-arching
orthodoxy is rejected, and its authors called heretics. Entire areas of
research, as well as promising new lines of approach, are thus disqualified.
Furthermore, the unconscious need to bring the medical world into "religious
obedience frequently leads to (involuntary) falsifications of results,
as became clear with Pasteur's discoveries. The medical credo takes precedence
over reality, something that scientists refuse to acknowledge when it
does not correspond with their preconceived ideas.
And lastly, the hidden religious dimension of modern medicine inhibits
the free debating of already fixed beliefs, and preventing them from being
properly re-examined and criticised. Indeed, dogmatism, irrationality
and passions - all characteristic of the religious experience - take precedence
over any calm and carefully thought out argument, even over the most tenuous
facts. The same vehemence that led Galileo to be condemned by the Church
for his theories, in spite of the scientifically demonstrable facts, is
now being used by medicine to reject any thesis that is contrary to its
own dogmas. Science has learnt its lessons from the Church.
My aims in writing and lecturing on this topic have therefore been several.
Firstly, I wanted to bring to the fore this phenomenon of projection and
transfer of religious content, which takes place in the medical field.
In recognizing this phenomenon, we should then dissociate from medical
practice the spiritual aspirations that quite logically can only be satisfied
in the spiritual dimension. It is dangerous to mistake eternal life with
physical immortality, or to think we can achieve collective salvation
through science and genetic engineering instead of individual salvation
through transformation and personal achievements.
I also hope that by bringing to the fore the influence of religious beliefs
in medicine, which is but one example of a very widespread phenomenon
today, readers will start thinking about how their beliefs filter their
perceptions, biasing and distorting them. Every time an object, a person,
a social group or an event becomes the target of religious projections,
there is danger. Their real characteristics fade in the eyes of those
who colour them with their beliefs. These targets then become the objects
of religious urges, impervious to any rationalisation, whether they are
expressed through fear, hatred, "devilisation and search for
scapegoats, or through deification, idealisation and unconditional devotion.
From Princess Diana to Wacco, and from Mother Teresa to Saddam Hussein,
there are numerous examples of the kind of consequences brought about
by this transfer of religious expression to real persons or situations.
Beyond this dissociation of medicine and religion, I would like to encourage
an increased awareness of the fears found in the depths of our consciousness,
which remain the hidden determining factors of most of our actions. As
shown in my book, these fundamental fears - fear of death, mostly, but
also fear of evil, fear of suffering, fear of separation, fear of solitude
- have lead humanity, at all times throughout history, to make up all
kinds of beliefs, in an effort to exorcise these fears. Then, with the
development of science and the rise of intellectualism, mankind has tried
to justify rationally these beliefs, hidden under the cloak of medicine
and life sciences.
In other words, there are three layers superimposed inside us:
1) a core of fears, from which we have learned
to protect ourselves by covering it with
2) a layer of beliefs, which make us feel
safe (even though those fears have not disappeared), this layer being
itself dissimulated under
3) an intellectual varnish, a rational facade,
which give us the illusion of having transcended superstitions and beliefs,
and which shelters us from our fears, keeping us barricaded behind intellectual
But in reality, as soon as any unexpected event scratches this varnish,
our underlying beliefs and fears reveal their presence and their indirect
As long as they are not acknowledged, accepted and transformed, these
fears will feed on every area of human endeavour. The intellect cannot
think freely and the heart may not love fully, as long as both of them
are hamstrung by the permanent task of appeasing our deepest anxieties,
which keep trying to re-surface in our consciousness. No technological
innovation, no scientific discovery, no external knowledge will ever enable
us to avoid this confrontation with ourselves, and - more specifically
- with our shadow. It is quite instructive to see to what degree the intellectual
and technical knowledge of this century - often quite remarkable - remains
captive to the fears that haunt society. We only have to look at the poor
state of our planet, at the multiplicity of wars and at the emergence
of new diseases, to see how this way of using our inner capacities is
Finally, through this increasing awareness and consciousness to which
I invite my readers, I hope to encourage greater individual responsibility,
be it on the medical or on the spiritual level. It seems inexplicable
to me that we should give away our power to whatever external authority
(priests, physicians, experts) and then blame them for abusing us with
it. Very few people are capable of being totally impartial and disinterested,
especially when money and power are at stake. And especially when psychological
studies show that the noblest motivations often go hand in hand with more
dubious unconscious intentions.
Therefore, taking personal responsibility for our own health, our own
inner evolution, and our own life at every level, without rejecting any
available help or advice, remains the safest and most rewarding attitude.
The obscurantism that endures under new forms will not so much be fought
by the lights of science than by the sparks of our own self-awareness,
that each one may awaken in himself. At least, such is my conviction.
This text has been written for CONTINUUM
Magazine and is based on the book "Médecine,
Religion et Peur; linfluence cachée des croyances
by Olivier Clerc The book has been published with Editions Jouvence, 1999.
The author can be contacted at <firstname.lastname@example.org>